HomeCases from GeorgiaDoctors' CaseAlleged violations
 actual informations 
 Law office
 World Jurist Association
 Human Rights
 Cases from Georgia
   Situation in Georgia
   Case G. Tsetskhladze
   Doctors' Case
     Statement of facts
     Alleged violations
       Violations of Article 3
       Violations of Article 5
       Violations of Article 6
       Violations of Article 6 (1)
       Violations of Article 6 (2)
       Violations of Article 6 (3)
       Violations of Article 7
       Violations of Article 8
       Object of the Application
     Release from prison
   Case of Judge N. Khazhalia
 Imprint
 NEWSARCHIV

Alleged violations


Statement of the Alleged Violation of the Convention And Relevant Arguments

The applicants observe that the Republic of Georgia had ratified the Convention (1) prior to the date the prosecution against them commenced. The European Court of Human Rights is competent ratione temporis, ratione personae, ratione loci and ratione materiae.

The applicants are victims of arbitrary and illegal persecution, conviction and punishment. This case involves several momentous violations of Georgian national law and fundamental principles of law as cited in the European Convention of Human Rights. The judgments of the domestic courts were also based upon unlawful evidence and obvious misinterpretation of law as well as upon incredible ignorance of facts and law.

__________

(1)
Ratification date 20 May 1999


See arguments for violations of



08.11.2007:
Ausnahmezustand in Georgien und vorgezogene Präsidentschaftswahlen [weiter]


Older informations you can find in our archive
HOME | WORLD JURIST ASSOC. | HUMAN RIGHTS | IMPRINT | CREDITS


© 2015 by Rechtsanwalt Wolfgang Schulz, Berlin | Rev: 01.04.2015